Students in Dr. Krause's FinTech Topics course will be soon popping the hoods on the various robo-adviser and digital banking products to evaluate their true costs and effectiveness
The New York Times article I posted recently on LinkedIn about “The
Fleecing of Millennials” certainly created some strong opinions on both
sides of the topic. I also believe that the recent Baillie Gifford newsletter written
by Tom Coutts on “Riding the Gravy Train – Who Guards the Guards?” has the same
potential for controversy.
Coutts forwards the concept that maybe the investment industry
has reached its peak (similar to peak oil) and it may have reached the point where
the industry has extracted the maximum rate of return from its clients’ assets.
The incredible growth of low-cost funds over traditional investment products is
exhibit 1 in the argument that investors are fighting back against hidden fees and mediocre performance.
Coutts posits that the investment industry might have seen its
best days and that as fees fall, so too will profit margins (and salaries). Commenting
further he stated that “It seems to us that most funds’ fees are too high, most
so-called investors’ time-horizons are too short, and most firms operate with their
eyes focused inwardly on their own interests rather than outwardly on their
clients.”
While some of us are just beginning to ask the question of whether
the traditional financial industry creates value above what it extracts – or whether
it is just a facilitator taking fees for low value-added services - millennials
are voting with their feet.
Millennials are seeking financial advice, but they
are also more likely to trust digital advice from automated investment services
(robo-advisors and mobile banking apps) than their parent’s generation.
US market research company, Forrester, recently surveyed online
adults in twenty markets to determine their need for, and perception of,
financial services. The resulting report tells it all, “Millennials want
financial advice, with or without humans.”
The Michael Milken / Gordon Gekko / Liar’s Poker / Bernie
Madoff / Wolf of Wall Street personalities (real or fictitious) have created an
image of slick, pin-striped, ‘greed is good’ robber barons – out to line their
pockets at the expense of the average Joe or Jane. Because the younger generation is skeptical of
the lack of transparency and are demanding value for the fees they are paying, maybe
this is a situation where we might be seeking the reverse of the “Fleecing of
Millennials.”
I have an assignment due soon from the students in my spring semester
FinTech Topics course where they are going to be doing deep research into the
true fees and costs of the robo-investment and digital banking products. They will study performance
relative to fees and provide an evaluation of the value of these new banking
and investing products. We’ll be certain to post their results soon – it should
be interesting to see what this group of millennials concludes about digital versus traditional finance.